Quote:
Originally Posted by Food Network Fan I think anytime they have a show where they put people who have never been on TV into a spotlighted segment where they will be nervous and awkward it's not going to be as exciting as people who know how to play to a camera. |
I'd agree. About 10 times a year, I do public speaking, extemporaneously describing a sporting event over a PA to a few thousand people, and it took a few events to become remotely comfortable with myself, and handling the whole experience of it. It finally became easy after about 10-12 times. It is NOT easy, right Radio-Doug?
But thats not what's wrong with the show IMHO. Its the over-production. It doesn't need a crowded hollywood studio of butts in grandstand seats. It doesn't need computer-controlled LED lighting. It doesn't need zooming in/out camera shots. This blistering falsetto pace works against it, not for it.
Like the reviewer in the allyourtv.com site wrote, that after beginning with the premise idea of an Iron Chef format for "just folks".......
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AllYourTV.com Instead of making the show distinctive, the alterations just make the whole thing seem clumsy. There are entirely too many extra steps in the competition and all that extra stuff just squeezes out the cooking part of the show. |

Ten minutes into the show, its predictability was quickly evident and from then on, it became a bit of a bore.
On the plus side however, I'd say the producers pick of the various recipes was pretty good. I wanted to know a little more about them, especially the pineapple chicken. I felt sorry for the guy with the beer can chicken though--he didn't have a chance when the lady judge/carver knocked down the whole plating.
I did have to laugh at the last 30 seconds of the show, with the outakes of the Summers/Fieri crackup takes. I'm really wanting to know just what it was that made these two guys turn into crying and laughing fits!
Again, on the ten-scale, this show starts with a 4, with maybe a potential of a 7.5-8.0